Was there a comet impact in AD 536? Maybe.

[tweetmeme only_single=false service=”wp.me” source=”allinthegutter”]

In the year AD 536 something catastrophic happened which caused a drop in the global temperature lasting several years and led to widespread famine, and possibly plague outbreaks too. This is right in the middle of the Dark Ages – a time about which by definition we know very little – so how can we be so sure about this? Well, it turns out that when human records are sparse, tree records step in to fill the gap. The series of concentric rings in the trunk of a tree provide a history of its growth and, seeing as a new ring is made every year, its age. If a summer is a lot colder than normal then a tree has to conserve its energy and so forms a narrower ring than it would have if the weather had been better. This is exactly what’s seen in the tree ring record for nearly ten years, beginning in AD 536.

The historical record of this period isn’t completely Dark, and the surviving accounts provide a clue as to what could have caused the prolonged cold snap. The interestingly named Michael the Syrian wrote that “…the Sun was dark and its darkness lasted for eighteen months; each day it shone for about four hours, and still this light was only a feeble shadow” while someone called Lydus in Constantinople observed that “…the Sun became dim…for nearly a whole year…so that the fruits were killed”. There are also numerous Chinese references to obscured skies and summer frosts.

All of this points towards something in the atmosphere – a ‘dust veil’ – which blocked sunlight and cooled the planet. But what could have put a load of dust into the atmosphere? Here, things get more intriguing. The obvious culprit is the ash and sulphuric acid produced by an enormous volcanic eruption – a phenomenon known as a ‘volcanic winter’. 1816, the ‘Year Without a Summer’, is a more recent example of this, caused by the eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia. However, volcanic debris is easy to spot as it leaves a very recognisable acid layer trapped in an ice sheet in somewhere like Greenland. Therefore all we have to do is extract an ice core, figure out which bit of it corresponds to the sixth century and look for the layer. Simple. Unfortunately for this theory though, by the late 90s no convincing volcanic signature had been found……

The alternative, astronomical, scenario for the AD 536 dust veil is an asteroid or comet impact. No impact crater has ever been linked to this time period which points towards a mid-air explosion called an airburst. These release large amounts of energy in the form of a tree-flattening shockwave (as happened in Tunguska in 1908) and can also potentially trigger forest fires, which could in turn inject large quantities of soot into the atmosphere. This is where I get involved. Several years ago I was part of a group that tried to calculate how big a comet-triggered-fire would have to be to cause the observed cooling. It turned out that the answer to this is an area the size of Northern Europe which seems rather unlikely! Surely there would have been some record if this had happened? Clearly fires could have added to the cooling but they couldn’t have been the sole contributor. Comet impact plumes may provide the solution. When the comet airbursts, some energy from the explosion, along with the debris, is funneled back along the impact path causing a plume of material, which then falls back onto the top of the atmosphere and causes the dust veil. Case closed, right? As with most things in astronomy, it’s not that simple.

The comet impact theory looked to be the most likely explanation until early last year when Larsen et al. published a paper presenting new and improved ice core measurements. These finally showed a clear volcanic related acid signal for AD 536, larger than the one found for the Tambora eruption mentioned earlier.

This should be the end of the story. Indeed, until several hours ago when I started putting this together and happened to come across this abstract, I thought it was. Their tantalising, but still unpublished, detection of impact debris in the AD 536 layer of another ice core points back to the cometary culprit again. Without reading the full paper nothing’s certain, which means that the Larsen et al detected volcano is the best option for now!


Comet vs. volcano!

Larsen, L., Vinther, B., Briffa, K., Melvin, T., Clausen, H., Jones, P., Siggaard-Andersen, M., Hammer, C., Eronen, M., Grudd, H., Gunnarson, B., Hantemirov, R., Naurzbaev, M., & Nicolussi, K. (2008). New ice core evidence for a volcanic cause of the A.D. 536 dust veil Geophysical Research Letters, 35 (4) DOI: 10.1029/2007GL032450

14 Comments on “Was there a comet impact in AD 536? Maybe.”

  1. Pierce R. Butler says:

    Though I’m neither a historian nor a geologist, I thought David Keys made a strong case for a “volcanic winter” starting in 535 C.E. in his book Catastrophe: A Quest for the Origins of the Modern World.

    Has this been debunked?

    • Emma says:

      Yes, I think he did. The problem has always been finding a strong enough ice core signal of the right date. I don’t know what evidence he was using, but I think there were ice cores associated with AD 536 in the late 1990s that were later re-dated so he may have based his conclusions on one of those.

  2. Katkinkate says:

    Could it be both? Comet impact setting off a volcano?

  3. David Marjanović says:

    Impacts cannot set off volcanoes.

    The question is if impacts can generate sulfuric acid. In principle, that’s of course possible when a big impact happens on sulfate rock (as happened 65.5 million years ago and ended the “age of dinosaurs”). But a mid-air explosion? Hard to imagine.

  4. […] Was there a comet impact in AD 536? Maybe:  In AD 536, some sort of catastrophic event caused widespread famine and a drop in global temperatures, confirmed by tree ring data and what little historical accounts exist.  The most obvious suspect is a massive volcanic eruption, but other evidence suggests that a comet impact may be the culprit.  Emma at We are all in the gutter describes the controversy and the evidence on each side. […]

  5. Paul79 says:

    A few years ago, some one had suggested for the 536 AD event, a volcanic eruption in the Rabaul, New Guinea region. (Reference or origin of this not known.)

  6. Thony C. says:

    The expression Dark Ages is no longer used by historians😉

    • Emma says:


      • Thony C. says:

        You actually have here a major terminological problem caused by the general problem of historical periodisation. The time in which your climatic anomaly falls is considered to be both late antiquity and early middle ages. This can be illustrated by considering Boetheus (ca. 480 – 524 or 525) and Cassiodorus (c. 485 – c.585) who, depending on context, are both regarded as the last of the classical Romano-Hellenistic philosophers or two early mediaeval philosophers. You pays yer money and you makes yer choice.

      • Emma says:

        It’s interesting that the climate anomaly seems to fall at the point where history changed sufficiently for historians to define a new historical period. Its almost as if some disaster occurred that resulted in massive societal upheaval….

      • Thony C. says:

        You’ve just delivered the “proof” that it must have been a comet😉

  7. cube says:

    Time will tell which alternative caused the AD 536 dust veil. Meanwhile, it makes a fascinating mystery.

  8. […] up the Oort cloud and throws comets our way, greatly increasing the possibility of a collision (and all the nasty effects that could go with it). This potential star was christened Nemesis for obvious […]

  9. Lin Deahl says:

    Why is it an either or causation? In 535 the trees show a sudden growth decline and the thunders roar is heard in china- A volcano? Then in 539-40 the trees take another nose dive while Europe is flush with eyewitness testimony that a comet and all its debris is heading for earth. For something to stop normal tree growth and weather for 30 -35 years- it seems that it would take multiple events over time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s